public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/100740] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu since r9-4145-ga81e2c6240655f60
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 12:15:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-100740-4-leGBXSgDbI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-100740-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100740

--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener <rguenth@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1af8528d34418bc874ae9d993ee0dc3559972d2

commit r12-6844-gf1af8528d34418bc874ae9d993ee0dc3559972d2
Author: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Date:   Mon Jan 24 11:50:06 2022 +0100

    tree-optimization/102131 - fix niter analysis wrt overflow

    This fixes the overflow issues seen with analyzing
    BASE0 + STEP0 cmp BASE1 + STEP1 as BASE0 + STEP0 - STEP1 cmp BASE1
    by following the logic we have when simplifying comparisons.

    2022-01-24  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>
                Jiufu Guo  <guojiufu@linux.ibm.com>

            PR tree-optimization/100740
            PR tree-optimization/101508
            PR tree-optimization/101972
            PR tree-optimization/102131
            * tree-ssa-loop-niter.cc (number_of_iterations_cond): Properly
            constrain BASE0 + STEP0 cmp BASE1 + STEP1 to
            BASE0 + STEP0 - STEP1 cmp BASE1 transform.

            * gcc.dg/torture/pr100740.c: New testcase.
            * gcc.dg/torture/pr101508.c: Likewise.
            * gcc.dg/torture/pr101972.c: Likewise.
            * gcc.dg/torture/pr102131-1.c: Likewise.
            * gcc.dg/torture/pr102131-2.c: Likewise.
            * gcc.dg/torture/pr102131-3.c: Likewise.
            * gcc.dg/torture/pr102131-4.c: Likewise.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-24 12:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-24 11:10 [Bug tree-optimization/100740] New: wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
2021-05-24 11:25 ` [Bug tree-optimization/100740] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu since r9-4145 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-24 11:58 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01  8:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-27 23:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-17 10:01 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-09 17:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-19  8:38 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-17 21:20 ` [Bug tree-optimization/100740] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu since r9-4145-ga81e2c6240655f60 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-24 12:15 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-01-24 12:46 ` [Bug tree-optimization/100740] [9/10/11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-24 12:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-26 13:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-07  9:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27  9:45 ` [Bug tree-optimization/100740] [10/11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:40 ` [Bug tree-optimization/100740] [11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-100740-4-leGBXSgDbI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).