From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id CFEF03855591; Tue, 2 May 2023 20:14:52 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CFEF03855591 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1683058492; bh=nWmInDg6oLi7gZX/eNeORC595EHEE8AS6FcMUng81GA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KCBmVgCwZJ7ylpF0byFIUFSDAbPlahcmFZHtcGnUUJW9rOaCMb0ruRAdEgHWPsSV9 JloQmhtnzzJXHsFBkPV2phyC4+9zTONsD7644xWnBglr9dYOB/G5z7QA1rof6YqmJA gyI86wZFEEzbK3HfB64/wzQEw5dAXcSO4bPhOkeo= From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/100758] __builtin_cpu_supports does not (always) detect "sse2" Date: Tue, 02 May 2023 20:14:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100758 --- Comment #26 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7fce881241b4f6492d8d321322fcb3412dea2137 commit r11-10713-g7fce881241b4f6492d8d321322fcb3412dea2137 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Thu Feb 9 17:43:19 2023 +0100 i386: Call get_available_features for all CPUs with max_level >=3D 1 [PR100758] get_available_features doesn't depend on cpu_model2->__cpu_{family,mode= l} and just sets stuff up based on CPUID leaf 1, or some extended ones, so I wonder why are we calling it separately for Intel, AMD and Zhaoxin and not for all other CPUs too? I think various programs in the wild which aren't using __builtin_cpu_{is,supports} just check the various C= PUID leafs and query bits in there, without blacklisting unknown CPU vendors, so I think even __builtin_cpu_supports ("sse2") etc. should be reliable if those VENDOR_{CENTAUR,CYRIX,NSC,OTHER} CPUs set those bits in CPUID = leaf 1 or some extended ones. Calling it for all CPUs also means it can be inlined because there will be just a single caller. I have tested it on Intel and Martin tested it on AMD, but can't test it on non-Intel/AMD; for Intel/AMD/Zhaoxin it should be really no change in behavior. 2023-02-09 Jakub Jelinek PR target/100758 * common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h (cpu_indicator_init): Call get_available_features for all CPUs with max_level >=3D 1, rath= er than just Intel or AMD. (cherry picked from commit b24e9c083093a9e1b1007933a184c02f7ff058db)=