public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/100770] Incorrect if constexpr statement in ranges::unique_copy
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 21:22:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-100770-4-S8ZtlxUjAJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-100770-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100770

--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
<ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bee80d74f7ebc8e1ada913aa059dedc0976f28c0

commit r10-9908-gbee80d74f7ebc8e1ada913aa059dedc0976f28c0
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Jun 3 12:30:29 2021 -0400

    libstdc++: Avoid hard error in ranges::unique_copy [PR100770]

    Here, in the constexpr if condition within ranges::unique_copy, when
    input_iterator<_Out> isn't satisfied we must avoid substituting into
    iter_value_t<_Out> because the latter isn't necessarily well-formed
    then.  To that end, this patch factors out the condition into a concept
    and uses it throughout.

    This patch also makes the definition of our testsuite
    output_iterator_wrapper more minimal by setting its value_type, pointer
    and reference member types to void.  This means our existing tests for
    unique_copy already exercise the fix for this bug, so we don't need
    to add another test.  The only other fallout of this testsuite iterator
    change appears in std/ranges/range.cc, where the use of range_value_t
    on a test_output_range is now ill-formed.

            PR libstdc++/100770

    libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

            * include/bits/ranges_algo.h (__detail::__can_reread_output):
            Factor out this concept from ...
            (__unique_copy_fn::operator()): ... here.  Use the concept
            throughout.
            * testsuite/std/ranges/range.cc: Remove now ill-formed use
            of range_value_t on an output_range.
            * testsuite/util/testsuite_iterators.h (output_iterator_wrapper):
            Define value_type, pointer and reference member types to void.

    (cherry picked from commit 0614bbbe59c6953e088cffa39dfe63d86fc1fa96)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-10 21:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-26 14:49 [Bug libstdc++/100770] New: " hewillk at gmail dot com
2021-05-26 14:59 ` [Bug libstdc++/100770] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-26 15:25 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-03 16:36 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-10 21:11 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-10 21:22 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-06-10 21:23 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-100770-4-S8ZtlxUjAJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).