From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id DE8B6385381F; Wed,  2 Jun 2021 00:31:49 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DE8B6385381F
From: "amodra at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/100799] Stackoverflow in optimized code on PPC
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 00:31:49 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: amodra at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget cc
Message-ID: <bug-100799-4-qCorIWPDa7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-100799-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-100799-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 00:31:50 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100799

Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Target|powerpc                     |powerpc64le
                 CC|                            |amodra at gmail dot com

--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> ---
The disassembly says this is powerpc64le.  Possibly interesting fact: the
offsets used above the stack frame are 400, 432, 440, which all correspond =
to
the parameter save area.  I don't see any reason that DGEBAL should have a
parameter save area though since all parameters can be passed in regs.=