From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 61C5E3858C2C; Thu, 25 May 2023 17:16:42 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 61C5E3858C2C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1685035002;
	bh=twCPjFRXKLS2OUoVi/o8be4inMYz9W21ag6nXsM7hwM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=BlkL398WLYI18Mve71qpGFHZIGPwNC8VazmpL+cgJqMzC9gLC52trEJJafkKhconE
	 3B7o5Qa+6P0ChCVaNd6x7T1JPa8v81gG5mqwzDOP0CSmXrOii4laNY3P+SYPAbpwKd
	 6DKDFThjAFWzLoiIqnscX14hPDh/r3OLDqRazv5o=
From: "hiraditya at msn dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/100811] Consider not omitting frame pointers by default
 on targets with many registers
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 17:16:42 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hiraditya at msn dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-100811-4-u9ZU1PXalJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-100811-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-100811-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100811

--- Comment #8 from AK <hiraditya at msn dot com> ---
Should we enable frame-pointers by default for RISCV64 as well?=