From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B0EF83858D33; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 07:55:12 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B0EF83858D33 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1681977312; bh=f73GiU9LzEDs4wK+dKTd+gehGuZgz6vqbe+YastrXhE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=oaCTDff5FgGsuinBsmJUbdKDd8bEZ0R0S3fA9GDVT7NIoPLFZpEjab0ZSAIHvozwL X8TWWlRxvjYVTCh6umLH52cxWGmiU2UPcMvBUXICHBNbrhP6gj/RkxPO06nHgXXZnG X8c10+3cIl4SunuIGhBAYKupPHyHpKH1FB4lggH0= From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/100815] [10/11 Regression] Segfault assigning to scalar allocatable polymorphic LHS since r11-6253-gce8dcc9105cbd404 Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 07:55:12 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100815 --- Comment #7 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka --- > Many thanks, Martin. You're welcome! > PS How do you do this location - by hand or do you have a script to do the > bisection? I have a script that uses pre-built GCC binaries: https://github.com/marxin/script-misc/blob/master/gcc-bisect.py=