From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 58071384641A; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 06:35:33 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 58071384641A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1714026933;
	bh=RA60wglR06X+yM67M8Hg/pnFPo2dGlRsGP8f+tqbNhM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=cAmLrs8M95X6OxpDdYEuaW8/egaDYj3P1A+ang5wXZ+xA8nxvQnKEd6/1mns8i15K
	 FRqaimNeBgx/Lhp+Ox9SaODsvuDWsuesr8E+9NCte6+UoV5B8QGsNgp1Edvw6lLjQt
	 a+y0e90ncAg6sJtbWOJ5ryaaX6GcbnMJzPq7OR2k=
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/100815] [11 Regression] Segfault assigning to scalar
 allocatable polymorphic LHS since r11-6253-gce8dcc9105cbd404
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 06:35:32 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: WONTFIX
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-100815-4-NadhWCr5F0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-100815-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-100815-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100815

Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED

--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #6)
> (In reply to Martin Li=C5=A1ka from comment #5)
> > It's fixed on master with r12-3897-g00f6de9c691195.
>=20
> Many thanks, Martin.
>=20
> I'll try to apply it to 11-branch, if for no other reason than to see if =
it
> does so cleanly. Tobias must have thought that it was too invasive to
> backport.
>=20

I think that we should take this view, given the imminent opening of 15-bra=
nch.

Cheers

Paul=