From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B6A3E3858D37; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 06:46:32 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B6A3E3858D37
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1681973192;
	bh=Mtzmcn1Kh2zSFBpTpXFDuR8mwO5q3v/qkGwU8tADZbw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=PIFLPEVJw4d8zJnsTXfb/3aJy0AdcbwmS8j+IC/qfEut2CpUUa1MxlP95JmDH8p2u
	 pQDLe3BQXXekm5clJ/Mk0/5h7PjVixM02gqKTOrJOnUZqCDvo67H56+sLVaWyc8yjN
	 bh0ttUvXmTv2G1iRW93mD3a3x6L6rAgUp3ow2jaY=
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/100815] [10/11 Regression] Segfault assigning to scalar
 allocatable polymorphic LHS since r11-6253-gce8dcc9105cbd404
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 06:46:32 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-100815-4-eXGhGTbhXd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-100815-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-100815-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100815

--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Li=C5=A1ka from comment #5)
> It's fixed on master with r12-3897-g00f6de9c691195.

Many thanks, Martin.

I'll try to apply it to 11-branch, if for no other reason than to see if it
does so cleanly. Tobias must have thought that it was too invasive to backp=
ort.

So I can keep track, September 2021:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:00f6de9c69119594f7dad3bd525937c94c8200d0

Paul

PS How do you do this location - by hand or do you have a script to do the
bisection?=