From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D61D03853835; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 23:48:33 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D61D03853835 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/100864] New: (a&!b) | b is not opimized to a | b for conditionals Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2021 23:48:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2021 23:48:34 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100864 Bug ID: 100864 Summary: (a&!b) | b is not opimized to a | b for conditionals Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Take: _Bool f(int a, int b, _Bool e) { _Bool c =3D (a > b); _Bool d =3D !c; return (e & d) | c; } --- CUT ---- We get currently: c_5 =3D a_3(D) > b_4(D); _2 =3D a_3(D) <=3D b_4(D); _1 =3D _2 & e_7(D); _6 =3D _1 | c_5; But this should be optimized to just: c_5 =3D a_3(D) <=3D b_4(D); _6 =3D e_7(D) | c_5; I noticed this while fixing PR 96923.=