From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id DECFF385DC26; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 00:44:53 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DECFF385DC26 From: "jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/100910] Bind(c): errors handling long double complex Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 00:44:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 00:44:54 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100910 --- Comment #3 from Jos=C3=A9 Rui Faustino de Sousa --- AFAIK the "CMPLX" macros are part of C11 and should be defined in the stand= ard header "complex.h"... Since there are no complains about the header, maybe just adding the defini= tion of the macro will do the trick... #define CMPLXL(x, y) ((long double complex)((long double)(x) + I * (long double)(y))) I will attach an altered file. Thank you very much. Best regards, Jos=C3=A9 Rui=