public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/100934] [9/10 Regression] wrong code at -O3 during unrolling since r9-6299 Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:24:31 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-100934-4-IYEjgYdEgL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-100934-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener <rguenth@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b7878d4e179c72ad69cdd103fbbfe16bc38010db commit r10-9924-gb7878d4e179c72ad69cdd103fbbfe16bc38010db Author: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> Date: Mon Jun 14 14:57:26 2021 +0200 tree-optimization/100934 - properly mark irreducible regions for DOM The jump threading code requires marked irreducible regions for the purpose of validating jump threading paths but DOM fails to provide that resulting in mised number of iteration upper bounds clearing. 2021-06-14 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> PR tree-optimization/100934 * tree-ssa-dom.c (pass_dominator::execute): Properly mark irreducible regions. * gcc.dg/torture/pr100934.c: New testcase. (cherry picked from commit 788bb7edb3975b80c4cb16323e7a5e55a2471e46)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-16 14:24 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-06-06 20:49 [Bug tree-optimization/100934] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch 2021-06-06 21:07 ` [Bug tree-optimization/100934] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 during unrolling pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-07 8:38 ` [Bug tree-optimization/100934] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 during unrolling since r9-6299 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-07 8:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-07 10:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-07 13:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-11 9:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-14 2:48 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-14 12:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-14 12:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-14 13:02 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2021-06-14 14:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-14 14:39 ` [Bug tree-optimization/100934] [9/10/11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-16 13:12 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-16 14:24 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2021-10-13 10:09 ` [Bug tree-optimization/100934] [9 " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-13 10:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-09 7:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-100934-4-IYEjgYdEgL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).