From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 35C693857BAB; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 09:22:43 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 35C693857BAB
From: "stefansf at linux dot ibm.com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/100960] var-tracking: parameter location in subregister
 not tracked
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 09:22:43 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: stefansf at linux dot ibm.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-100960-4-BwiZFo6Q4I@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-100960-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-100960-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 09:22:43 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100960

--- Comment #4 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus <stefansf at linux dot ibm.=
com> ---
I really like the idea of enhancing cselib since there is a chance that oth=
er
passes might profit from it, too. The following patch fixes the initial
reported problem:

diff --git a/gcc/cselib.cc b/gcc/cselib.cc
index 6a5609786fa..64b6996a299 100644
--- a/gcc/cselib.cc
+++ b/gcc/cselib.cc
@@ -1569,6 +1569,25 @@ new_cselib_val (unsigned int hash, machine_mode mode,
rtx x)
   e->locs =3D 0;
   e->next_containing_mem =3D 0;

+  scalar_int_mode int_mode;
+  if (REG_P (x) && is_int_mode (mode, &int_mode) && REG_VALUES (REGNO (x))=
 !=3D
NULL
+      && (!cselib_current_insn || !DEBUG_INSN_P (cselib_current_insn)))
+    {
+      rtx copy =3D shallow_copy_rtx (x);
+      scalar_int_mode narrow_mode;
+      FOR_EACH_MODE_UNTIL(narrow_mode, int_mode)
+       {
+         PUT_MODE_RAW (copy, narrow_mode);
+         cselib_val *v =3D cselib_lookup (copy, narrow_mode, 0, VOIDmode);
+         if (v)
+           {
+             rtx sub =3D lowpart_subreg (narrow_mode, e->val_rtx, int_mode=
);
+             if (sub)
+               new_elt_loc_list (v, sub);
+           }
+       }
+    }
+
   if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_CSELIB))
     {
       fprintf (dump_file, "cselib value %u:%u ", e->uid, hash);

So I get the subvalue relation between 5:5 and 14:14 (was initially 15:15 b=
ut
changed meanwhile due to new GCC version)

(value/u:SI 5:5 @0x4f906e0/0x4f80730)
 locs:
  from insn 17 (subreg:SI (value/u:DI 14:14 @0x4f907b8/0x4f808e0) 4)
  from insn 1 (value/u:SI 6:263 @0x4f906f8/0x4f80760)
  from insn 1 (entry_value:SI (reg:SI 2 %r2 [ xD.2274 ]))
 no addrs=