From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B01843858C35; Sun,  3 Dec 2023 21:59:53 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B01843858C35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1701640793;
	bh=WoiPPFl9ZV23E+HraKhpI7cRUpH2/LMGHZUj6nGeuek=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=oVxGDWhMdn47L38dBAHg1OSbESADxknyJinpMAgf5fwne4SseMReorK/1t44sWoPw
	 F9hZuYE27EGvt7DeQA7TXFToWra1ThqLXfbo7qt2I8I5CBZ5MHS3g43xBDrnaEpoCO
	 IrSPy1Cpl1p2xZbJeRrKOldhemJpb0Z5B0+XjsBU=
From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/100988] Missed optimization: RESTRICT missing for
 optional arguments
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2023 21:59:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-100988-4-6VZEPAKc0a@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-100988-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-100988-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100988

anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 56781
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D56781&action=3Dedit
Improved patch

When looking at testcases, it appeared that POINTER attributes of CLASS dum=
my
arguments were not properly handled.  This is fixed by the attached patch.

@Tobias: may I proceed with this PR, or is there something else I am missin=
g?=