From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id ABEB83858D37; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 20:34:19 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org ABEB83858D37
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1687379659;
	bh=ZXnFlDIWZ5A7nTZasxga4WRSImzDYxSzJ0jdF7FlX5A=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=xCP5OI662f4Y6bJyoAlbSF5LCQ2zwc/+GHVRNLm7hdW0ShLYI2Ed+fBQPTxq6NGnt
	 WGa7axj58LcigrY7bCzAqNZmtLft5oZIW87o9dcJgsKGF8I41hBbd9Xxbn9PpqZHVX
	 J2+1tUcxgsXu47LO33CVRWBPhSpiNYnQRXW7xI8c=
From: "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/101002] Some powerpc tests fail with -mlong-double-64
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 20:34:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-101002-4-XLJiLG2zlJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-101002-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-101002-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101002

--- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #7)
> There are a few other testsuite regressions due to a linker warning the
> testsuite wouldn't ignore:
>=20
> /opt/binutils-power10/bin/ld: /tmp/ccysrhL7.o uses 64-bit long double,
> /lib64/libc.so.6 uses 128-bit long double

Sorry, I shouldn't call these "regressions", since they FAIL on the unpatch=
ed
--without-long-double-128 build too.  I just noticed them while scanning the
log files and thought I should mention them.=