From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 726703858D20; Wed,  5 Apr 2023 19:33:09 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 726703858D20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1680723189;
	bh=VJZnpOphXQRfiTMQIfCd3110wJT0gWjdp7+cacu/ixg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=jq1/fqWZlhQIrSRUFwpWdYMVso53o3KIp8fKXWHlkemItr4KvdXKLuUpWvrKk/NOl
	 bxW+V2ieuNsa+ttVTC14HZN7hPG+jDpyZC3b58IzFnzV4Ifl8UK7hmYTGEkH9A9MPX
	 LmQY7fQ/YX69puswEI1CUQicXCtKn+sNkwy2Y4tw=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/101024] Missed min expression at phiopt1
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2023 19:33:08 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-101024-4-uS6twYsSi3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-101024-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-101024-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101024

--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Part of this is in the patch set in bug 25290 comment # 27 patch set. Mostly
the "c ? min/max : min/max" part, I still need to implement the "c ? min : =
d"
part.=