From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 780443858D33; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 07:04:33 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 780443858D33
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1680246273;
	bh=qGIv9j/a+ZWc8gkiBwbLq41NkSLcDpMWCP9QAyRg5GY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=qif+7pEHxr5AO1K3NWfuSs/E4mcO0LULYCsS7lfOMWz2t6ux/vAC96qhJ5zBiVGLJ
	 lo4qErISgptEdD7Y2/67ZquTqJBKOr95tqMhTSMKryByyV3xN2BxwLe/3HgJwG3686
	 Xqpv7SOJFP3Sbo89OkuMMYrgir0a5sPLcYNKBXuY=
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/101047] Pointer explicit initialization fails
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 07:04:32 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status everconfirmed cc
Message-ID: <bug-101047-4-u28vx89CUy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-101047-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-101047-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101047

Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-03-31
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
                 CC|                            |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #3)
> Did we let this fall in a crack or was there some other holdup?

I cannot speak for anybody else but it came up during my long break from
gfortran support and so I certainly missed it.

I feel that this is sufficiently obtrusive that it will have to wait for 14=
.0.0
to open. That said, I have put it on my TODO list to review.

I discovered that pointer initialization is an issue just yesterday after
taking a peek at recent posts by Peter Klausler on clf.

Paul=