From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 166063858C50; Wed, 8 Feb 2023 22:41:51 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 166063858C50 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1675896111; bh=9+kzTLQ9J+R5jS8n+mToaqBJ29HncOcLzt78K/vlcMM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=evHKpLiyJSv9wchgfKbhHL1PQskmeKQkcu12yDOGxIvGR3MoRcjcqHImk3GYJBcmZ mtw9QFFZVobXo3RBCLeeCBO/pEp1rEm2yWLqEUD8X3tpNF6A4yH8zD6A4z3NKbJv/L qzmSrpBi9/eBoaa29BSaFXY02BU2rY7e829tURxY= From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/101073] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:6941 Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2023 22:41:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101073 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- A similar test that doesn't use op=3D: struct Y { int a; }; struct X { Y b =3D Y{1}; Y c =3D this->b; }; constexpr X o =3D { }; static_assert(o.b.a =3D=3D 1 && o.c.a =3D=3D 1, "");=