From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id EDAA6398B878; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 17:43:50 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EDAA6398B878
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/101078] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Rejected code since
 r12-1272-gf07edb5d7f3e7721
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 17:43:50 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone cc short_desc
Message-ID: <bug-101078-4-Oc9MJmPFln@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-101078-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-101078-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 17:43:51 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101078

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|11.2                        |9.5
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
            Summary|[11/12 Regression] Rejected |[9/10/11/12 Regression]
                   |code since                  |Rejected code since
                   |r12-1272-gf07edb5d7f3e7721  |r12-1272-gf07edb5d7f3e7721

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Indeed.  When the f call is in a method of B rather than of a nested class,=
 it
works fine and when it isn't in a template too.
Extending to 9/10 too because of the B::f() case but should be kept P1 beca=
use
the f() case is a regression since 11.1.=