From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id E9BF038515E0; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 10:56:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E9BF038515E0
From: "mose at gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/101111] xgcc cross-compiler for x86_64-apple-darwin
 in GCC 11.1 doesn't generate weak symbols, resulting in undefined reference
 to ___lsan_default_suppressions
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 10:56:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mose at gnu dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-101111-4-8Ad6RYvcAh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-101111-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-101111-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 10:56:25 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101111

--- Comment #11 from Mos=C3=A8 Giordano <mose at gnu dot org> ---
> This is OK for master and back-ports from the Darwin perspective

Thanks for the review and confirmation!

> (I guess Martin plans to deal with this since he has assigned the PR, but=
 if he does not have time, I can apply this for you if you don't have write=
 access).

Yes, I don't have write access, so someone else will need to apply the patch
:-)=