public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "mose at gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug sanitizer/101111] Undefined reference to ___lsan_default_suppressions when compiling GCC 11.1 for x86_64 macOS Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 22:17:38 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-101111-4-ccoerkBRif@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-101111-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101111 --- Comment #1 from Mosè Giordano <mose at gnu dot org> --- To add more information, the real problem seems to be that xgcc can't generate weak symbols: sandbox:${WORKSPACE}/srcdir/gcc_build # x86_64-apple-darwin14-nm x86_64-apple-darwin14/libsanitizer/lsan/.libs/lsan_common.o | grep '___lsan' 00000000000018c0 T ___lsan_default_options U ___lsan_default_suppressions 00000000000018a0 T ___lsan_disable 0000000000003440 T ___lsan_do_leak_check 0000000000003460 T ___lsan_do_recoverable_leak_check 00000000000018b0 T ___lsan_enable 00000000000014c0 T ___lsan_ignore_object U ___lsan_default_suppressions 0000000000001580 T ___lsan_register_root_region 00000000000017c0 T ___lsan_unregister_root_region ___lsan_default_suppressions and ___lsan_default_suppressions should be weak, instead they're undefined. I can reproduce the same issue with this simpler example: sandbox:${WORKSPACE}/srcdir/gcc_build # /workspace/srcdir/gcc_build/./gcc/xgcc -B/workspace/srcdir/gcc_build/./gcc -x c - << EOF #include <stdio.h> int __attribute__((weak)) func(int); #if 0 int func(int a) { return 2 * a; } #endif int main() { if (&func) { printf("Func implemented: %d\n", func(10)); } else { printf("Func not implemented\n"); } return 0; } EOF Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: "_func", referenced from: _main in ccMDdanO.o ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-17 22:17 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-06-17 19:01 [Bug sanitizer/101111] New: " mose at gnu dot org 2021-06-17 22:17 ` mose at gnu dot org [this message] 2021-06-18 19:42 ` [Bug sanitizer/101111] xgcc cross-compiler for x86_64-apple-darwin in GCC 11.1 doesn't generate weak symbols, resulting in undefined reference to ___lsan_default_suppressions mose at gnu dot org 2021-06-18 19:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-18 22:46 ` mose at gnu dot org 2021-06-18 23:24 ` mose at gnu dot org 2021-06-18 23:53 ` mose at gnu dot org 2021-07-19 20:33 ` mose at gnu dot org 2021-07-22 18:06 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-07-22 19:01 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-07-25 10:54 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-07-25 10:56 ` mose at gnu dot org 2021-08-03 11:25 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-03 11:25 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-101111-4-ccoerkBRif@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).