From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id BCC92382C42F; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 17:05:07 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BCC92382C42F
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/101134] Bogus -Wstringop-overflow warning about
 non-existent overflow
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 17:05:04 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed
 resolution
Message-ID: <bug-101134-4-j9ROVGADm1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-101134-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-101134-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 17:05:07 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101134

Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-06-24
                 CC|                            |segher at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |---

--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #7)
> Changing the warning text from "does X" to "may do X" wouldn't help becau=
se
> all instances of it (or all warnings) would have to use the latter form, =
and
> that's already implied by the former.  Every GCC warning already means
> "something looks fishy here" and not "this is definitely a bug."

Yes.  And most warning texts do not say "A is B" when that is not true.
All that do are buggy.


Reopened.=