From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 6B0783959E45; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 14:03:23 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6B0783959E45
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/101182] [concepts] ICE with ++ in non-template
 requires-expression
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 14:03:23 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-101182-4-nDt9UUs5hv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-101182-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-101182-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 14:03:23 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101182

--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
<ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f00006c007f3f7e9b6fdd9906ed1e4c791f6b15

commit r11-8729-g0f00006c007f3f7e9b6fdd9906ed1e4c791f6b15
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Jun 24 11:29:02 2021 -0400

    c++: requires-expression folding [PR101182]

    Here we're crashing because cp_fold_function walks into the (templated)
    requirements of a requires-expression outside a template, but the
    folding routines aren't prepared to handle templated trees.  This patch
    fixes this by making cp_fold use evaluate_requires_expr to fold a
    requires-expression as a whole, which also means we no longer need to
    explicitly do so during gimplification.  (Note that we delay folding
    of such requires-expressions for sake of better diagnostics when one is
    used as the condition of a failed static_assert.)

            PR c++/101182

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

            * constraint.cc (evaluate_requires_expr): Adjust function comme=
nt.
            * cp-gimplify.c (cp_genericize_r) <case REQUIRES_EXPR>: Move to=
 ...
            (cp_fold) <case REQUIRES_EXPR>: ... here.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-requires25.C: New test.

    (cherry picked from commit c06493dc30afbf65b14d783c7cd53f20877ef577)=