From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 632343858D3C; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 06:19:05 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 632343858D3C
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/101185] [12 Regression] pr96814.c failed after r12-1669
 on non-avx512 platform
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 06:19:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-101185-4-YGsOwtvNT0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-101185-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-101185-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 06:19:05 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101185

--- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Mon, 20 Sep 2021, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101185
>=20
> Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
>=20
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---
>            Keywords|wrong-code                  |
>              Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
>=20
> --- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> The code is not wrong, just the testcase is written such a way it thinks =
it can
> get away with not using avx code which is not always going to be true.  I=
 have
> a patch which fixes avx-check.h, avx2-check.h, and avx512-check.h.  Obvio=
us it
> just accidently works really.

IIRC HJ posted quite some variants of patches for the underlying issue=20
(but eventually none were applied)=