From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id EBD463858CDB; Thu, 25 May 2023 09:47:59 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EBD463858CDB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1685008079;
	bh=hZEpwW2ccLQ7DcxdrAZRPw3zXNWBuGdZEdbbvk8ZWMk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=orWv2cdBFZyyyouftoTFaivUtc5LMyCFOCg04ihdz1qxaSwd6rkRIzegdtb8QQDNx
	 z8cxA+8iIemnWCPgYI1bKIhPH2zmauKnRWue3B9dvNLKoVtos7Y3Rab4TVbkVstY5o
	 AUEdxVim6CkZwEdQjgAeql/Q4Y24iY9yxh88WAkI=
From: "gjl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/101188] [AVR] Miscompilation and function
 pointers
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 09:47:58 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ra, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-101188-4-9rxfjHdH9T@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-101188-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-101188-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101188

--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay <gjl at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
On branch releases/gcc-5.4.0, the wrong code is since r226119, which is a
backport of r225918.

Doesn't look like this caused the current PR; maybe that change just unmask=
ed a
bug in postreload that's even older.=