From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 879643861800; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:14:57 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 879643861800 From: "maxsamukha at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug d/101226] New: Suboptimal codegen for >>/>>> Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:14:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: d X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: maxsamukha at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone cf_gcctarget Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:14:57 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101226 Bug ID: 101226 Summary: Suboptimal codegen for >>/>>> Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: d Assignee: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org Reporter: maxsamukha at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Target: AVR example.d: void f1() { __gshared ubyte value; value >>>=3D 5; } void f2() { __gshared ubyte value; value =3D value >>> 5; } ---- avr-gcc -fno-druntime -O3 example.d: example.f1(): lds r24,example.f1().value swap r24 lsr r24 andi r24,lo8(7) sts example.f1().value,r24 ret example.f2(): lds r24,example.f2().value ldi r25,0 ldi r27,0 ldi r26,0 ldi r18,5 1: lsr r27 ror r26 ror r25 ror r24 dec r18 brne 1b sts example.f2().value,r24 ret The compiler apparently fails to optimize out the integer promotion for >>>= in f2 and produces inefficient machine code.=