From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id C0ABB385AC24; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:10:55 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C0ABB385AC24
From: "giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/101258] std ::is_integral_v is undocumented
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:10:55 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: documentation
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: WONTFIX
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-101258-4-f5HQYKJDG5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-101258-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-101258-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:10:55 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101258

--- Comment #7 from Christopher Yeleighton <giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl> -=
--
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> (In reply to Christopher Yeleighton from comment #3)
> > It should at least be present on the API page.  The standard is not for
> > developers.
>=20
> cppreference.com is not the standard, it's a reference for developers.
>=20
> (In reply to Christopher Yeleighton from comment #4)
> > What is self-explanatory in is_integral_v?
>=20
> If you don't know what the xxx_v variables in <type_traits> do, you should
> get a good (modern) tutorial on C++.

"Self-explanatory" implies that no tutorial is needed.=