From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 776C03858C3A; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 15:22:50 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 776C03858C3A
From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/101263] non-propagating-cache::emplace-deref missing
 constexpr
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 15:22:50 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-101263-4-RPKPFHHdPV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-101263-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-101263-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 15:22:50 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101263

--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #1)
> > We might first need to implement P2231 (for constexpr optional) before =
this
> > function can be properly constexpr.
>=20
> Implemented in r12-4389

Yay, thanks!  I thought this would be enough to straightforwardly make
emplace-deref constexpr, but I ran into an unrelated wrinkle.  During const=
expr
evaluation we can't use placement new to initialize the contained value
directly from *__i and instead have to use the equivalent of
construct_at(&value, *__i), but the latter incurs an extra move due to the
temporary materialization of *__i, which is contrary to the effects of
emplace-deref ([range.nonprop.cache]/1.6):

  Calls reset().  Then initializes the contained value as if
direct-non-list-initializing an object of type T with the argument *i.

Am I missing something or is it not possible to perform this direct-init in=
 the
constexpr case?=