From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 64F4B3857C68; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 22:17:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 64F4B3857C68
From: "gcc at alanwu dot email" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/101265] C2X [[maybe_unused]] ignored when placed after array
 declaration
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 22:17:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gcc at alanwu dot email
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-101265-4-yFJvMGDUzi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-101265-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-101265-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 22:17:24 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101265

--- Comment #2 from Alan Wu <gcc at alanwu dot email> ---
>         int thisdoesnt[1] [[maybe_unused]];
> Whereas that one appertains to the array type

This seems to contradict the latest document I could find about the attribu=
te
syntax proposal. From N2335
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2335.pdf:


>     [[attr1]] int [[attr2]] a[10] [[attr3]], b [[attr4]];
> attr1 appertains to the variable declarations a and b, attr2
> appertains to the type int, attr3 appertains to the variable
> declaration a, and attr4 appertains to the variable declaration b.

GCC warns about a and b for the following:

    void foo(void) {
        int a[10] [[maybe_unused]], b;
    }=