public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/101301] Improving sparse switch statement
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:31:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-101301-4-CxaGRRJfA8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-101301-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101301
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed| |2021-08-12
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Ha :-) Too bad we can only warn "invalid sum of incoming frequencies", it
> still
> happens too often (read: at all) to actually error on it... that would
> perhaps
> grab people's attention :-)
I can confirm switch lowering is not updating BB counts and I see some other
issues related to edge probabilities. I have a partial fix, but I'm going to
return to it once stage1 is gone.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-12 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-02 15:32 [Bug tree-optimization/101301] New: " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-03 10:41 ` [Bug tree-optimization/101301] " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-03 18:42 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-03 19:34 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-03 21:57 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-04 17:37 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-05 5:33 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-05 17:33 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-06 13:39 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-06 16:35 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-12 10:31 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-11-30 13:04 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-03 9:04 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-101301-4-CxaGRRJfA8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).