From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 0C4653850414; Sun,  4 Jul 2021 13:12:31 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0C4653850414
From: "janpmoeller at gmx dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/101315] New: C++20 lambdas in unevaluated context:
 erroneously fails with "incomplete type"
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2021 13:12:30 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: janpmoeller at gmx dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-101315-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2021 13:12:31 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101315

            Bug ID: 101315
           Summary: C++20 lambdas in unevaluated context: erroneously
                    fails with "incomplete type"
           Product: gcc
           Version: 11.1.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: janpmoeller at gmx dot de
  Target Milestone: ---

gcc 11.1 and gcc (trunk) fail to compile the following code with --std=3Dc+=
+20:

(1)
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
#include <concepts>
#include <vector>

template <typename Ptr, std::regular_invocable<int> Fn>
struct foo_t {
  foo_t(Ptr ptr) {}
};

template <typename T>
using alias =3D foo_t<T, decltype([](int) { return 0; })>;

template <typename T>
auto fun(T const& t) {
  return alias<T>{t};
}

int main() {
  std::vector<int> v;
  auto const error =3D fun(v);
}
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////=
/////

Both versions of gcc state:

<source>: In function 'int main()':
<source>:19:14: error: 'const void error' has incomplete type
   19 |   auto const error =3D fun(v);
      |              ^~~~~
Compiler returned: 1

The issue seems to somehow be related to the alias. Replacing the definitio=
n of
fun() with this code results in successful compilation:
(2)
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
template <typename T>
auto fun(T const& t) {
  return foo_t<T, decltype([](int) { return 0; })>{t};
}
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////=
/////

Specifying the return type of fun() explicitly results in a different error:
(3)
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
template <typename T>
auto fun(T const& t) -> alias<T> {
  return alias<T>{t};
}
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////=
/////
<source>: In function 'int main()':
<source>:19:22: error: 'fun' was not declared in this scope
   19 |   auto const error =3D fun(v);
      |                      ^~~
Compiler returned: 1

I believe all three variants to be valid c++20.

clang (trunk) compiles versions (1) and (2) of the code, (3) results in a
frontend crash (I'm going to file a bug report against clang for that as we=
ll.
I'll comment it here for reference after I'm done).
Also see this link to godbolt: https://godbolt.org/z/r9GMfxzEo=