From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 0BF4A383D818; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 16:24:13 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0BF4A383D818 From: "fchelnokov at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/101344] New: braced-init-list not supported in an aggregate deduction Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2021 16:24:12 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: fchelnokov at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2021 16:24:13 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101344 Bug ID: 101344 Summary: braced-init-list not supported in an aggregate deduction Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: fchelnokov at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Please consider the program as follows. GCC correctly initializes struct A,= but in more simple case of struct B it fails: ``` template struct A { T t[N]; }; template struct B { T t[2]; }; int main() { A a{{1, 2}}; // ok in gcc B b{{1, 2}}; // error in gcc (ok in other compilers, e.g. msvc) return a.t[0]; } ``` I believe, struct B initialization shall work here same way.=