From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 7CD3E3848015; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 17:09:56 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7CD3E3848015
From: "sirl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/101393] PowerPC32 inline assembly broken by commit
 2d94f7dea9c73ef3c116a0ddc722724578a860fe
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 17:09:56 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: assemble-failure, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sirl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-101393-4-OtmDM2PYl2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-101393-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-101393-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 17:09:56 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101393

--- Comment #9 from Franz Sirl <sirl at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #8)
> I don't think it is a good idea to add workaround upon workaround to avoid
> some of the not-so-useful behaviours of -many.  Instead, we should just
> not use -many?

As I understand it -many is just one variation of the general problem with =
the
sticky flags. If we remove -many from the assembler, there are still other
sticky flags like -mvsx. Turning of any sticky flag is currently not suppor=
ted
by the assembler AFAICS. So for example it's impossible to switch from a VSX
supporting assembler mode to an assembler mode without VSX via the .machine
pseudo-op. Or did I misread the the assembler source?=