From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 996073860C3D; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:18:37 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 996073860C3D From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/101443] internal compiler error: in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1519 Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:18:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, needs-bisection X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:18:37 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101443 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gn= u.org --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 51148 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D51148&action=3Dedit gcc12-pr101443.patch Untested fix. I think it is best to optimize away these comparisons, as NULLPTR_TYPE has only one possible value, we can always determine the resul= t, =3D=3D, <=3D and >=3D will be always true and !=3D, < and > will be always = false. And keeping it around in the IL can break various optimizations, e.g. the r= ange stuff (in fold-const and reassoc), or dom, anything that will try to build_int_cst 1 or -1 or something similar when it sees a comparison of something with INTEGER_CST.=