From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E9DEB3861C5F; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 16:42:08 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E9DEB3861C5F From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/101474] SRA sometimes produces worse code with inline functions (seen with -fipa-icf sometimes) Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 16:42:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 16:42:09 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101474 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|-fipa-icf generates worse |SRA sometimes produces |code for identical function |worse code with inline | |functions (seen with | |-fipa-icf sometimes) Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2021-07-16 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- This worse code generation has nothing to do with -fipa-icf really as shown= by: struct t { char x; int y; }; void fn1(struct t *p, struct t v) { *p =3D v; } void fn3(struct t *p, struct t v) { fn1(p, v); } ------ CUT ---- What is happening is SRA decides it is best to do a full scalar replacement= for the v that is inlined into fn3 (from fn1).=