From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 2E2893858C56; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 09:47:08 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2E2893858C56 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/101482] operator== for basic_string and __versa_string should check sizes first Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 09:47:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on assigned_to everconfirmed bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 09:47:08 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101482 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2022-06-16 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu= .org Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jiang An from comment #0) > It seems that the resolution should be generalized to all specializations= of > basic_string (by removing the legacy operator=3D=3D overload and SFINAE i= n the > new overload, which is already done by libc++ and msvc stl). Yes, https://wg21.link/lwg2852 clarified that we can do that. > IMO the > generalized resolution can also be applied to operator=3D=3D for __versa_= string. Yes I'll do that, thanks.=