From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 985DE395B438; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 16:06:42 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 985DE395B438 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1668614802; bh=YPXpHLIxojYZEJXL4oixejibVPiM7CipX5BktRb6Qhs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Y/mB9TeNbeGyVsz504QlFSYAzcH4swmwzJ0qwdZc/qE39PaeqH/KxRf40XfP1ex4g qp/eDP+ZHhOdgygVjpyma+T8o0weYm0uXxTYpifIL/pQxhsb7rkEcY6JwmMbN929JQ MEwTmYZblXwKZgPxfconTwVOJzdnSw3Am3el98s8= From: "developer at lorenzosalvadore dot it" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug jit/101491] /usr/local/include/libgccjit++.h conflicts between different GCC installations Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 16:06:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: jit X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: developer at lorenzosalvadore dot it X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101491 --- Comment #12 from Lorenzo Salvadore --- I have sent by mail an alternative patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/jit/2022q4/001572.html It should be functionally equivalent to John's patch, but it is written wit= h a different style. It is the patch that is now used in the FreeBSD ports tree= for the lang/gcc11 and lang/gcc12 ports.=