From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id ECB853858C5E; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 12:58:43 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org ECB853858C5E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1711025923;
	bh=gF3FvqLM8YByBoznDEolfRs3JU1x8wXK1VMfFmmtM7E=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=UaN9b8FwpH+ACNi9XK3Rt9cqocO1h0NrPe/OV7xdRTtJJQNCayFtU4bBT0Y5yeqdb
	 btqPk4MzlRQflkTMLjgugZQA0/3HmvB9TAolZDNSNvL7egnkBFiUL278eElObxhN2i
	 lZ9XZpvkxxBP4h6r5i6r5OP+iuG1VOH131+eDo/Y=
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/101523] Huge number of combine attempts
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 12:58:42 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog, memory-hog
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-101523-4-3KD3uZowdr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-101523-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-101523-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101523

--- Comment #39 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #37)
> Created attachment 57753 [details]
> quick attempt at a limit
>=20
> So like this?

Hrm.  It should be possible to not have the same test 28 times.  Just at one
spot!=