From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 238613858401; Thu,  7 Mar 2024 09:26:55 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 238613858401
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709803615;
	bh=XuMERvPWY+ycR5girdW9lCSiU+ZUQ1IyzNa0hZQbw14=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=G1nADTf4wfQrLadSyPiixmKEu2mLzhynF7Q2+l7lqF04/CFhR4tXKy+lRoHIamR3V
	 s94tXMvso/B0erUClcPJVb7n15Yib7HTs0T2xbf0I4HsrH/30N8GmjhV0SMgllX9Z8
	 zy+KXbzxFlfC8pVDUUC5xlt8gaDyVRDPVqYppoZM=
From: "krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/101523] Huge number of combine attempts
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2024 09:26:53 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog, memory-hog
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-101523-4-9YlDtCDTYA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-101523-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-101523-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101523

--- Comment #19 from Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Sarah Julia Kriesch from comment #15)
> (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #13)
> > (In reply to Sarah Julia Kriesch from comment #12)
> > A bigger case of what?  What do you mean?
> Not only one software package is affected by this bug. "Most" software
> builds are affected. As Andreas mentioned correctly, the fix is also
> beneficial for other projects/target software.

I don't think we have any evidence yet that this is the problem which also =
hits
us with other packages builds. If you have other cases please open separate=
 BZs
for that and we will try to figure out whether it is actually a DUP of this
one.

With "targets" I meant other GCC build targets. This pattern doesn't look
s390x-specific to me, although I haven't tried to reproduce it somewhere el=
se.=