public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/101523] Huge number of combine attempts
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 16:53:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-101523-4-UnxGa39klT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-101523-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101523

--- Comment #51 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #46)
> Maybe combine already knows that it just "keeps i2" rather than replacing it?

It never does that.  Instead, it thinks it is making a new I2, but it ends up
to be exactly the same instruction.  This is not a good thing to do, combine
can change the whole thing back to the previous shape for example, when it
feels like it (combine does not make canonical forms ever!)

> When !newi2pat we seem to delete i2.  Anyway, somebody more familiar with
> combine should produce a good(TM) patch.

Yes, the most common combinations delete I2, they combine 2->1 or 3->1 or 4->1.
When this isn't possible combine tries to combine to two instructions, it has
various strategies for this: the backend can do it explicitly (via a
define_split),
or it can break apart the expression that was the src in the one set that was
the ->1 result, hoping that the two instructions it gets that way are valid
insns.  It tries only one way to do this, and it isn't very smart about it,
just very heuristic.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-27 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-20  9:35 [Bug rtl-optimization/101523] New: " krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-20  9:41 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/101523] " krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-20  9:42 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-20 21:27 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-24  5:45 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-25 10:53 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-25 15:06 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-02 18:43 ` sarah.kriesch at opensuse dot org
2024-03-02 21:04 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-03 19:32 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-04  8:18 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-04 16:31 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-04 16:49 ` sarah.kriesch at opensuse dot org
2024-03-04 21:26 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-05  7:31 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-05 10:36 ` sarah.kriesch at opensuse dot org
2024-03-06 22:49 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-06 22:53 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-06 23:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-07  9:26 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-07  9:28 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-07  9:34 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-07 15:51 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-07 15:52 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-07 16:11 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-07 16:19 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-07 16:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-07 16:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-07 18:15 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-07 19:42 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-07 19:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-07 20:10 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-07 20:17 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-07 20:53 ` krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-20 11:53 ` [Bug target/101523] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-21  7:56 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-21  8:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-21  8:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-21 12:57 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-21 12:58 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-21 13:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-21 13:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-22  8:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-22  9:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-22  9:42 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-22  9:42 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-22  9:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-22 12:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-22 12:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-27 14:35 ` sarah.kriesch at opensuse dot org
2024-03-27 16:10 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/101523] " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-27 16:53 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2024-03-27 16:55 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-03 10:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-05 11:48 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-05 12:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-10  6:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-10 15:51 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-10 15:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-10 17:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-10 17:45 ` sarah.kriesch at opensuse dot org
2024-05-04  6:00 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-04 13:14 ` sarah.kriesch at opensuse dot org
2024-05-04 17:30 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-06  9:21 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2024-05-06  9:40 ` segher at kernel dot crashing.org
2024-05-06  9:42 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-06  9:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-101523-4-UnxGa39klT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).