From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4ECF23858D39; Thu,  7 Mar 2024 09:28:44 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4ECF23858D39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709803724;
	bh=S/osr6LtA+ljoiDIq5jsU9EyFay5I5bAjQXnXgYadCs=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ckbewLdS87c7cEm984q1PaKhd4Q+w4BnCYZFMXqbZ4ChxNtipBTmH1U9aXE9vRi9X
	 lAPZNTXVcCEO9y/yAaj+dDOozfd6cF4AD8397XSMpg8+mI9MPOPuff9D0HgFYQiz4X
	 T4vjwrOkfiMR1pKX+vSXHew9dnyd0RdkRINlEwoA=
From: "krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/101523] Huge number of combine attempts
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2024 09:28:43 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog, memory-hog
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-101523-4-mgePBtqo4b@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-101523-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-101523-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101523

--- Comment #20 from Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #17)
...
> So what is really happening?  And, when did this start, anyway, because
> apparently at some point in time all was fine?

Due to the C++ constructs used the testcase doesn't compile with much older
GCCs. However, I can confirm that the problem can already be reproduced with
GCC 11.1.0.=