From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id CA00D3858282; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 09:52:21 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CA00D3858282
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1711101141;
	bh=CI29707nOjtAbPaNww0f93QPxpZmyYd3bZbgh1QOpcQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=LyrgoUCz8/Q2VBxFpSZ17OoNou9q3H1ENiUdwWWQvT1CTaKyelfGd4zreOccxSRJS
	 1UCjB5qftx3/aNttuF+b2pwC/CsjZmttC994DCjrroaxGbxDFde3mHAPvkkksjTiQT
	 v7V6BV7ZEdb9VkfqP4r4eWhqi0xS/sbaLQQ31gV8=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/101523] Huge number of combine attempts
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 09:52:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog, memory-hog
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-101523-4-opVueafD2b@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-101523-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-101523-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101523

--- Comment #46 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Maybe combine already knows that it just "keeps i2" rather than replacing i=
t?
When !newi2pat we seem to delete i2.  Anyway, somebody more familiar with
combine should produce a good(TM) patch.=