From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D43863858D34; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 13:58:47 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D43863858D34 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/101539] [C++20] Implement builtins for layout-compatibility and pointer-interconvertibility traits Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 13:58:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 13:58:47 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101539 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 51186 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D51186&action=3Dedit gcc12-pr101539.patch So, I've tried to play with the __is_layout_compatible trait, here is the result. There is one known bug, the C++ FE unfortunately removes zero sized bit-fields early, for layout compatibility we need them (and now just that = they were present but how many as well and their types). Can we not remove them= or remove them when the FE parses the whole TU? The testcase also contains various cornercases where layout-compatibility as currently defined is just weird.=