From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B19B63891002; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 07:58:39 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B19B63891002 From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/101544] [OpenMP][AMDGCN][nvptx] C++ offloading: unresolved _Znwm = "operator new(unsigned long)" Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 07:58:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openmp, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: component short_desc cf_gcctarget cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 07:58:39 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101544 Tobias Burnus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|c++ |target Summary|[OpenMP] 'declare target' |[OpenMP][AMDGCN][nvptx] C++ |block around class =E2=80=93 |offloading: unreso= lved |unresolved _Znwm =3D |_Znwm =3D "operator |"operator new(unsigned |new(unsigned long)" |long)" | Target| |nvptx-none,amdgcn-amdhsa CC|cltang at gcc dot gnu.org |ams at gcc dot gnu.= org, | |vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- Looking at it more closely, the problem seems to be that libstdc++{.so,.a} does not exist for neither nvptx nor amdgcn =E2=80=93 and the ME handles th= is correctly. The question is what's needed to get better libstdc++ support =E2=80=93 eit= her full support or like with libgfortran for nvptx stripped-down minimal version.=