From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 337293858C62; Thu,  9 Feb 2023 00:23:50 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 337293858C62
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1675902230;
	bh=0BPGsKxiq83uC/xCFsQvGVuX57iTzFgBCfNhseCOn6I=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=AOcyYtyorreRCo58kn6Bm9saMr0PWCpW0djTqJuZ4EN69vJzsaatgm3QFrHoObDd4
	 rjdnAdiZsi3bSS/u4ziaYhH+cos7lmahdB9Zp9/Isbm5UuonlaPFYUSqz1INgog7df
	 i1ER0ooNnqts2cholqwFx5CMLotxD5Cg63Enmcbo=
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/101588] [DR2126] rejects valid constexpr when binding from
 a constexpr function and initializer_list
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2023 00:23:49 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on cc bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-101588-4-jZbLwuzzlc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-101588-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-101588-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101588

Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-02-09
                 CC|                            |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This came up again in bug 107079.  The static_assert should pass after fixi=
ng
bug 107079  but doesn't because we don't fully implement the

-- a temporary object of non-volatile const-qualified literal type whose
lifetime is extended ([class.temporary]) to that of a variable that is usab=
le
in constant expressions, or

bullet.

struct X {
  const X* x =3D this;
};
constexpr const X& x =3D X{};
static_assert(x.x =3D=3D &x);=