From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A93943858C3A; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 20:12:53 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A93943858C3A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1692043973; bh=6e7le9EMOFk5vhoboqdeYaWPPR2+HKHLPbgnUg9iBBg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CtvM07KiuLe4UI96cBLFceYKPiVD+l9JjOwsTD1BuiWVkG5biXhSSB6crIWSlMo0J MK6yq+dyqJIr63o7lIQfiabRWPm+PY5yiZZUHb/VrXrs8sxYp23Oeuas/6xjtzXQ6D cQ2/9q8yYrEglNhzfSATl0v9mOScyGHKWRvfknAg= From: "marshall.ward at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/101602] [F2018] local and local_init are not supported in DO CONCURRENT Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 20:12:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marshall.ward at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101602 Marshall Ward changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marshall.ward at gmail dot= com --- Comment #2 from Marshall Ward --- I've tested this in 13.0.0 and it appears that `local`, `local_init`, `shar= ed` are still not supported in `do concurrent` and produce syntax errors. Has there been any activity on this issue recently? If not, could anyone comment on the proposal by Jeff Hammond about utilizing the analogous OpenMP constructs? Would this be a feasible option?=