From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id AE4C6385BAEC; Mon,  4 Jul 2022 12:15:39 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AE4C6385BAEC
From: "njuwy at smail dot nju.edu.cn" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug gcov-profile/101618] [GCOV] Wrong coverage caused by call site
 in a "for" statement
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2022 12:15:34 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: gcov-profile
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: njuwy at smail dot nju.edu.cn
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-101618-4-qi5nZ6ZxXA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-101618-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-101618-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2022 12:15:39 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101618

--- Comment #3 from Yang Wang <njuwy at smail dot nju.edu.cn> ---
(In reply to Yang Wang from comment #2)
> The coverage is correct later version =EF=BC=88gcov 11.1.0 and 12.1.0=EF=
=BC=89,is it fixed?
In version 12.1.0

        1:  133:static void __attribute__((noinline)) foobar(bitmap_head
*chain) {
        -:  134:  bitmap_iterator rsi;
        -:  135:  unsigned int regno;
        1:  136:  for (bmp_iter_set_init(&(rsi), (chain), (0), &(regno));
        3:  137:       bmp_iter_set(&(rsi), &(regno)); bmp_iter_next(&(rsi),
&(regno)))
        2:  138:    catchme(regno);
        1:  139:}=