public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/101639] New: vectorization with bool reduction
@ 2021-07-27 10:58 glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-27 11:21 ` [Bug tree-optimization/101639] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-27 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101639
Bug ID: 101639
Summary: vectorization with bool reduction
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: x86_64-*-*
bool f(char* p, long n)
{
bool r = true;
for(long i = 0; i < n; ++i)
r &= (p[i] != 0);
return r;
}
is not vectorized, while if I simply declare r as char instead of bool, it is
(not quite optimal since it fails to pull &1 out of the loop, but that's a
separate issue).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/101639] vectorization with bool reduction
2021-07-27 10:58 [Bug tree-optimization/101639] New: vectorization with bool reduction glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-07-27 11:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-06-18 6:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-06-18 6:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-27 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101639
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |53947
Last reconfirmed| |2021-07-27
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
vectorizable_reduction fails the
6692 scalar_dest = gimple_assign_lhs (stmt);
6693 scalar_type = TREE_TYPE (scalar_dest);
6694 if (!POINTER_TYPE_P (scalar_type) && !INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (scalar_type)
6695 && !SCALAR_FLOAT_TYPE_P (scalar_type))
6696 return false;
6697
6698 /* Do not try to vectorize bit-precision reductions. */
6699 if (!type_has_mode_precision_p (scalar_type))
6700 return false;
check. I guess we could relax that for BIT_*_EXPR reductions. But then
we run into
t5.c:4:21: note: vect_is_simple_use: vectype vector(16) unsigned char
t5.c:4:21: missed: mixed mask and nonmask vector types
t5.c:1:6: missed: not vectorized: relevant stmt not supported: _7 = _4 &
r_14;
t5.c:4:21: missed: bad operation or unsupported loop bound.
I guess that's mainly a fault of missed bool pattern handling of the
reduction - we fail to make p[i] != 0 available as non-boolean vector.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
[Bug 53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/101639] vectorization with bool reduction
2021-07-27 10:58 [Bug tree-optimization/101639] New: vectorization with bool reduction glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-27 11:21 ` [Bug tree-optimization/101639] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-06-18 6:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-06-18 6:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-06-18 6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101639
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2021-07-27 00:00:00 |2024-6-18
CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Re-confirmed. To recap:
t.c:4:21: note: === vect_determine_precisions ===
t.c:4:21: note: using normal nonmask vectors for r_14 = PHI <_8(6), 1(5)>
t.c:4:21: note: using boolean precision 8 for _4 = _3 != 0;
t.c:4:21: note: using boolean precision 8 for _8 = _4 & r_14;
...
t.c:4:21: note: ==> examining phi: r_14 = PHI <_8(6), 1(5)>
t.c:4:21: note: get vectype for scalar type: bool
t.c:4:21: note: vectype: vector(16) unsigned char
..
t.c:4:21: note: ==> examining statement: _4 = _3 != 0;
t.c:4:21: note: vectype: vector(16) <signed-boolean:8>
t.c:4:21: note: nunits = 16
t.c:4:21: note: ==> examining statement: _8 = _4 & r_14;
t.c:4:21: note: vectype: vector(16) <signed-boolean:8>
t.c:4:21: note: nunits = 16
that doesn't match up. The solution might be to realize _8 is live and
thus needed as nonmask.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/101639] vectorization with bool reduction
2021-07-27 10:58 [Bug tree-optimization/101639] New: vectorization with bool reduction glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-27 11:21 ` [Bug tree-optimization/101639] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-06-18 6:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-06-18 6:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-06-18 6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101639
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |max.sagebaum at scicomp dot uni-kl
| |.de
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 115520 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-06-18 6:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-07-27 10:58 [Bug tree-optimization/101639] New: vectorization with bool reduction glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-27 11:21 ` [Bug tree-optimization/101639] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-06-18 6:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-06-18 6:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).