From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 4DC26385782B; Tue,  3 Aug 2021 23:28:22 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4DC26385782B
From: "StevenSun2021 at hotmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/101717] [12 Regression] ICE capturing static member within
 stateless generic lambda
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 23:28:22 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: StevenSun2021 at hotmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-101717-4-mnDxYptYei@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-101717-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-101717-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 23:28:22 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101717

--- Comment #5 from Steven Sun <StevenSun2021 at hotmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
Thanks!


(In reply to myself from comment #3)

> The program seems never think of a situation "a lambda inside a lambda
> inside a NSDMI`. We need to amend the logic here.


edit to:

The program seems never think of a situation "member function call inside a
generic lambda inside a lambda inside a NSDMI`. We need to amend the logic
here.


-------------------------------------

The direct cause of failure is in g:91e534b0d

```
if (!containing_function && !COMPLETE_TYPE_P (closure))
    /* If we're parsing a lambda in a non-local class,
       we can find the fake 'this' in scope_chain.  */
    init =3D scope_chain->x_current_class_ptr;
```

This part of logic is to find the potential `this` since there is a (static)
member function call `f`. Refer to the following comments:

  /* For the overload resolution we need to find the actual `this`
     that would be captured if the call turns out to be to a
     non-static member function.  Do not actually capture it at this
     point.  */


// in function `build_new_method_call_1` in `gcc/cp/call.c`

-------------------------------------

As for example in comment 1:


`scope_chain->x_current_class_ptr` is correctly set when parsing=20

```
[=3D](auto) { f(); }
```

But it was soon incorrectly set when instantiating the same lambda, i.e.
parsing

```
[=3D](auto) { f(); }()
```=20


This failure only affectes the potential `this` pointer inside the

```
[=3D](auto) { f(); }
```

But since here needs no `this` pointer, deleting that problematical
`gcc_checking_assert` is actually a potential fix for this problem.=