From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 4EB5C3857412; Wed,  1 Sep 2021 08:14:04 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4EB5C3857412
From: "clyon at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/101723] arm: incorrect order of .fpu and .arch_extension
 directives leads to unsupported instructions
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:14:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: assemble-failure
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-101723-4-0KocxA5ss8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-101723-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-101723-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:14:04 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101723

--- Comment #16 from Christophe Lyon <clyon at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #15)
> (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #14)
> > I think you forgot to backport
> > r12-2790-ga22b3e022c2b45047a28d901042888eb77620499 to gcc-9 ?
>=20
> I don't think so.  I think that patch collapsed away due to the way I end=
ed
> up resolving a merge conflict in an earlier patch.
>=20
> Are you seeing any test errors due to this?

Ha, right, there's no check-function-bodies in gcc-9.

I'm seeing:
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/attr-neon3.c scan-assembler-times vld1 1
on armeb, but that was already the case before your backport to gcc-9, so i=
t's
not related.=