From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B76DB3858C27; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 20:27:44 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B76DB3858C27 From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/101747] Two-argument version of attribute malloc does not perform overload resolution Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 20:27:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc keywords everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 20:27:44 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101747 Martin Sebor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2021-08-03 CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Keywords| |rejects-valid Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- I suppose the return type of the allocator could be used for the disambiguation. The difficulty here is that the attribute handler is in co= de shared by the C and C++ front ends with no good way to call a language-spec= ific routine to do overload resolution. Maybe the attribute should accept a str= ing with the mangled name of the function in addition to a function name. IIRC, attribute copy has the same limitation.=